|
Support
Education And Not Death Row
By James Conway, Prisonersolidarity.org
April
14, 2007
I received the flyer you sent me concerning
the proposed referendum to end the death penalty in Ohio. I'm sure
I speak for everyone on death row when I say we appreciate everything
that everyone does for us in all the anti-death penalty activist
groups. The thought that all these different people who have never
met me are out there pulling for me is very comforting. I agree,
though, that it would probably be more productive if everyone pulled
in the same direction. The referendum you suggested sounds like
a step in the right direction to me, and I am writing you to make
a suggestion that I believe would improve the chances of the referendum
passing. I'm sure you would agree that failure of such a referendum
would deal an almost fatal blow to the struggle to end the death
penalty in Ohio, at least for the immediate future. In my imagination
I can see the headline, "The People of Ohio have Spoken."
The
idea I have is somewhat based on a referendum I saw advertised during
the last election. The referendum was set up to try and dedicate
a larger percentage of the lottery money to the public schools by
removing some of the power of the legislature to do other things
with the money. My suggestion involves reallocating the tax dollars
spent on the death penalty directly to fund a scholarship program
for low income Ohioans, which would do more to reduce the crime
rate than the death penalty has ever done. Ending the death penalty
would instantly free up a significant amount of public funds. The
Ohio public defenders office has a death penalty section as does
the attorney general's office. The individual counties get money
also.
I
know it will be impossible to find all the resources the death penalty
consumes each year, but I bet a diligent person (or group of people)
could show that a few million in government funds would be freed
up every year if the death penalty were ended. This money could
be taken directly from its purpose in carrying out the death penalty
and used to create a scholarship program for low income Ohioans.
I've read that estimates are in the range of $1 million to $2 million
total to execute a single inmate over the course of the entire appellate
process, and that figure was above and beyond what it costs to house
the inmate for the 20 years the process takes. That was also said
to be a very conservative estimate. Those figures may be way off,
but for argument's sake, let's just say that the state spends $5
million a year directly on the death penalty that would be freed
up if the death penalty were ended. The average degree program being
under $50,000, that means every year 100 low income Ohioans could
receive a full ride to a four-year degree program. Essentially:
the referendum shouldn't be against the death penalty, it would
be for education.
Admittedly,
I know little about origin: referendums or about the breakdown of
how tax dollars are dedicated to the death penalty. But I do know
that a death penalty case is inordinately expensive. Death penalty
defendants receive two lawyers who get $25,000 each: and an aggravated
murder defendant receives a single lawyer who gets about $10,000.
On direct appeal, death sentenced inmates receive two lawyers again,
while all others receive one. Two lawyers are also assigned to do
post-conviction appeals at the same time, and no lawyers are required
to be assigned to persons not sentenced to death. That 540,000 at
trial and the three extra lawyers employed for about 3 years (just
on state appeals) translates into a lot of moneys, and that is only
a small fraction of what is actually spent. Death penalty trials
are twice as long as normal trials, and for every lawyer representing
the defendant/prisoner there is an adversary representing the state
on the other side.
This
is also the perfect time to present such a referendum. News story
after news story talks about how the United States is fallen behind
in education, we now have less engineers, scientists and generally
less college graduates than many developing countries. Besides that,
one of the main purposes of Governor Strickland's proposed budget
was to try and keep college tuition from increases at all this year
and only 3% next year to try and increase the number of people who
can afford to go to college.
In
short, I think there will be strong opposition to a referendum to
end the death penalty in Ohio. But if the choice is between the
death penalty and 50 or 100 college scholarships every year I think
there will be significantly less opposition even from those like
Governor Strickland who purport to be for the death penalty. Let's
face facts, there are quite a few people that will support the death
penalty on moral grounds regardless of how immoral we believe it
is. With a referendum such as the one I propose they will lose whatever
moral footing they have. As Governor Strickland himself said in
the State of the State address, Ohioans have to make some tough
choices and some sacrifices so that Ohio can be at the economic
forefront of the country, as it has been for the last 100 years.
Let's make the death penalty one of those sacrifices.
I
hope this idea is of some use to you. I wish I could do more to
try and implement something like this because I think it could really
make the difference, but I could not even begin to know where to
start.
I hope that you do you.
Sincerely,
James
Conway
--
James Conway, # 457-203
Ohio State Penitentiary
878 Coitsville-Hubbard Road
Youngstown, OH 44505-4635
Read another response by a man on death
row:
Alva E. Campbell, Letter
in Support of a Referendum
Here's the original letter.
The
following link offers tips for writing to prisoners: http://prisonersolidarity.org/TipsForWritingPrisoners.htm
|