 |
|
|
A Critical Look at the American
War on Drugs My prison term was 23 months in addition to the seizure of nearly half a million dollars by the Whitefish Police Department and the Northwest Montana Drug Task Force. Seized items included my home, a collection of automobiles, a motorcycle, a ski boat and some firearms. To initiate my arrest, a girlfriend with momentary objections to our personal situation dialed 911 and I walked away from the life I knew in handcuffs. The purchase of this property was made possible because of 35 years of employment in the railroad industry, construction trades, employment within my family's business and with legitimate entrepreneurial endeavors. The money made from sales of marijuana paled by comparison but task force warriors rushed to seize nearly all assets of value. Regarding marijuana, I humbly appeal to all who judged me then, and who judge other people and me now, to consider what I have learned through personal inquiry, observation and experience: Cannabis sativa/marijuana/pot/hemp originated early in the history of the world. It was a product of evolution, intelligent design, or a compilation of both. The plant has existed and has been utilized by people and cultures for a long time. The oldest piece of fabric known to man was made from hemp-cannabis sativa-and dates to 8,000 years before Christ. At some point early in the history of man, the plant was discovered for its mood-altering and medicinal effects. Ancient China and India provide the earliest records of its use. At the turn of the 20th century, as many as two thirds of the world's cultures used marijuana for pain relief and its euphoric qualities. In 1937, the U.S. legislated marijuana to be illegal with the passing of the Marijuana Tax Bill. Although doctors had been prescribing cannabis for a hundred years, the bill was rushed through Congress with no testimony by the American Medical Association. A clique of wealthy individuals and corporations employing and controlling the influence of newspaper and banking interests, along with friends and relatives in high levels of government, were able to manipulate the views of the American public. This scheming would reap billions in personal and corporate income for the parties involved, because there would be no competition from the hemp plant. When
I was in my teens and going to school in Columbia Falls, alcohol
was the drug of choice for the community and area, as it is today.
It was only natural that consumption would find its way into the
social scene of the youth. Binge drinking has probably been inherent
with alcohol use since fermentation was discovered. My first contact
with marijuana occurred when I was 18. Older friends returning from
Vietnam brought their observations of war and they told me about
the enjoyable and relaxing effects of marijuana. Some brought samples smuggled in their duty-free stereos. We were compatriots in life, and in breaking another taboo. I tried the stuff and liked it. It didn't make me ill. I wasn't obnoxious when using it, and my friends and I weren't drunkenly racing our cars and forgetting what we had done on previous evenings. Throughout history warriors have been returning to their homelands with different ideas and, with plunder. The introduction of cannabis to western civilization is believed to have occurred when Napoleon's troops invaded Egypt. This is the way of people. This is the way of the world. The primary argument for marijuana's illegal status is the belief that it provides a gateway to more harmful drugs. It is a gateway. Alcohol andtobacco are also gateways and have killed millions of people. Which gateways are most harmful and which are less harmful? And, if in living, we walk through a gate into a dangerous situation but can find our way back to the relative safety of the gate-are we always to be condemned? Lurking in a dark area, well beyond this "gate," is a frightfully addictive drug called methamphetamine. If the increasing use of meth, a poison made from poisons, could be reduced by offering the de-criminalized, and in this light, medical use of marijuana, wouldn't we benefit from the experiment? If the hemp plant could help our society decrease its dependence on foreign oil and forests of timber while providing farmers a durable, fast growing, drought resistant crop and offering industry a widely useable product, wouldn't we benefit from the experiment? The reason most people move from alcohol to marijuana is because an herb gives them a safer and more interesting experience than booze. Marijuana doesn't put its user over a toilet in the morning vomiting their guts out with a headache. Most people find marijuana more pleasurable than alcohol and easier on their lives. While under the influence of marijuana, an individual rarely loses control of his or her actions, or becomes obnoxious, mean or violent. These undesirable behaviors are common with the consumption of alcohol or methamphetamine. The reason people move from alcohol or marijuana to methamphetamine is because meth has more kick than either and is more readily accessible. It can be made from easily obtainable ingredients in the basement. The methamphetamine users I interviewed while incarcerated said that a big reason for their use of meth was because a product they preferred, marijuana, was more difficult to obtain. Many people who try meth would be delighted if they could legally return to the relative safety of marijuana use. The reason the government of the United States continues to wage a war on marijuana is shrouded in hypocrisy, deception and lies. Study
the issue. A good place to start is a book by Jack Herrer called
The Emperor Wears No Clothes. It tells the tragic story of
how a few greedy, self-serving individuals, managed to outlaw a
plant that threatened their foreseeable wealth and their personal
"moral values." A plant that had beenprescribed by doctors
for years, utilized by our nation and the world for paper, fabric
and food, was demonized. William Randolph Hearst ran the smear with
yellow journalism in his newspapers. The Dupont Corporation discovered
how to make a resilient plastic fiber and fabric with petroleum.
Until then, the country and military were reliant upon hemp for
durable rope and fabric. A combined effort of several key players organized the blacklisting and outlawing of marijuana and hemp. There was Hearst's media smear along with the racially motivated ranting of Harry Anslinger, basically our nation's first drug czar. Anslinger had been appointed to head the newly formed Federal Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs by Andrew Mellon. Mellon was Herbert Hoover's Secretary of the Treasury and the Mellon Bank was the banking choice for the Dupont family. This self-serving pack of opportunists presented their information to Congress and convinced the government to outlaw marijuana and hemp. They all profited immensely. Another
illuminating book about marijuana and its effects was the result
ofa study commissioned by Richard Nixon and his administration.
They got a group of scientists and doctors together to realistically
analyze the entire spectrum of information and fact surrounding
the marijuana issue that had emerged in the 60's. The book from
this study is Marihuana, A Signal of Misunderstanding, likely
the most comprehensive study of the plant and its effects in history.
The 1972 report summarized, "The evils of marihuana,"
(they spelled it with the harsher "h"), "are the
result of 30 years of instilled fear," and that the plant was
"incorrectly classified as a narcotic and should have fallen
into the same category as alcohol and tobacco." One simple
but poignant comment from the study said that a reason people experiment
with drugs is because America's social system "no longer inspires
in people a feeling of purpose and meaningfulness." They concluded
that the plant was not a significant problem and that the government
should consider regulating the product like alcohol and to re-evaluate
the process of criminalizing people and destroying lives because
of its use. Nixon and his group didn't like what they heard and
the study never made the light of day. Richard
Nixon got caught because of his Watergate burglars and resigned. The
Declaration of Independence is written on paper made from hemp.
George Washington advised farmers to grow the plant. He and Thomas
Jefferson, Ben Franklin and their perceptive cohorts might have
taken some puffs from the mentally stimulating herb while contemplating
a Declaration, Bill of Rights and Constitution for a great nation.
Wouldn't that have been a hoot? Even
some law enforcement officers realize America's prohibition on drugs
is a failed policy. One such group is called Law Enforcement Against
Prohibition. The following is an excerpt from their web site: "After
nearly four decades of fueling the U.S. policy of a war on drugs
with over half-a-trillion tax dollars and increasingly punitive
policies, our prisoner population has quadrupled over a 20 year
period making building prisons this nation's fastest growing industry.
More than 2.2 million citizens are currently incarcerated and every
year we arrest an additional 1.6 million for nonviolent drug offenses-more
per capita than any country in the world. The United States has 4.6 percent of the population of the world but 22.5 percent of the world's prisoners. Every year we choose to continue this war will cost U.S. taxpayers another 69 billion dollars. Despite all the lives we have destroyed and all the money so ill spent, illicit drugs are cheaper, more potent, and far easier to get than they were 35 years ago at the beginning of the war on drugs. Meanwhile, people continue dying in our streets while drug barons and terrorists continue to grow richer than ever before. We would suggest that this scenario must be the very definition of a failed public policy. This madness must cease!" Inform yourself. Watch the documentary calledHooked: Illegal Drugs, which has aired on the History Channel and discusses the reasons drugs were made illegal. Read The Emperor Wears No Clothes by Jack Herrer and Marihuana, A Signal of Misunderstanding by government study and your taxes. The latter is out of print, but copies can be found. Read Smoke and Mirrors, The War on Drugs and the Politics of Failure by Dan Baum and America's Longest War, Rethinking Our Tragic Crusade Against Drugsby Steven B. Duke and Albert C. Gross. Go online. The address for Law Enforcement Against Prohibition is www.leap.cc. Discover why an ever-growing number of lawmen and judges are realizing prohibition has failed America once again. The truth about America's involvement with drugs is available. Law enforcement personnel and judges, prosecutors, voters and the public at large need to know it. My analysis of this information prior to my arrest led me to believe that a sense of understanding concerning marijuana was beginning to prevail in our society, and consequently, in the courts and the minds of jurors. Even Montana's conservative legislature had voted 40 percent for allowing medical use of marijuana. While I was incarcerated, an initiative referendum to allow medical use was passed when placed before the voters of Montana. An argument was made that a large percentage of marijuana use is medical in nature. Mine was for pain reduction and relief from stress and depression. Some of my customers were cancer patients. They got good deals on their choice for medicine from me. I
broke the law and was arrested. I knew I risked imprisonment and
financial loss if caught selling marijuana. I sold only to adults
and advised my group of customers to do the same. I didn't think
my entire life's income would be at stake. Had I known this would
occur I would not have taken the risk. Because I disobeyed the law
of this land, I've had to accept the seizure of my possessions and
to serve my allotted time in prison. It is well beyond the time for America to critically analyze the costs associated with the drug war. A U.S. Department of Justice/Bureau of Justice Statistics webpage titled "Direct expenditures by criminal justice function, 1982-2001" lists the amounts of money the government spent for judicial, police and corrections between 1982 and 2001. Police expenses went from 19 million to 72.5 million per year, judicial costs rose from 7.7 million to 37.5 million and the cost of corrections jumped from 9 million to almost 57 million. The total amount spent for these three departments between 1982 and 2001 was 1.846 trillion dollars. It is common knowledge that the primary reason for this increase was the drug war. Extrapolating these figures into the future, to the year 2025, and estimating that the costs will only increase at the rates they did between 1982 and 2001 (3.78 percent for police, 4.84 percent for judicial and 6.3 percent for corrections) reveals unbelievable spending patterns. The 2001 figure of 72.5 million spent for police times 24 years times the 3.78 percent rate of increase totals 6.57 trillion to be spent between 2002 and 2025; the 2001 37.57 million spent for judicial purposes multiplied by 24 and then by 4.84 adds up to 4.364 trillion; and 56.95 million dedicated to corrections in 2001 will grow by another 8.61 trillion between 2002 and 2025. Add these three figures up and one comes up with a whopping 19.545 trillion to be spent arresting, trying and incarcerating America's citizens between 2002 and 2025. And that's if there is no exponential increase exceeding what occurred between 1982 and 2001. These figures represent the amount of money the U.S. will spend to provide justice for all offenders-murderers, child molesters, corporate raiders, thieves, drug users and drug dealers, etc. What percentage of these people will have been influenced directly or indirectly by the use or sale of drugs? Educated guesses range from 40 to 60 percent, depending on which professional you ask. Drug offenders surpassed violent offenders in 1990. If 40 to 60 percent of crime is either directly or indirectly related to drugs, America will be spending between 7.8 and 11.7 trillion to arrest, judge and incarcerate drug offenders between 2002 and 2025. One million, 678 thousand, one hundred and ninety-two people were arrested in America in 2003 for drugs. I was one of them. It won't be long before this nation will have fought and lost its hundred-year war against drugs. As a result of our government's aggressive campaign to control the lives of its citizens, we have the fastest growing imprisonment rate in the world. In the last five years we have arrested 9 million people for nonviolent drug offenses-far more per capita than any country in the world. Financially and morally, the people of this country, cannot afford the fight. And if America wants its problem with methamphetamine to decline, it will have to allow its citizens something more than alcohol to stimulate their lives. If allowing adults access to marijuana would reduce this country's methamphetamine habit, and significantly reduce our prison population and provide farmers a plant that could lessen the nation's demand on petroleum and wood products, wouldn't our society benefit from the experiment? Can America continue to support this war? Can all of the broken lives be justified? Is there a better path for the "land of the free"? Legalize marijuana. Let folks have their pot. Regulate and tax it like alcohol and cigarettes. Demand responsible use and see what happens. The experiment couldn't be worse than where we are or where we're headed. It's time to call a truce in America's longest war-the war against the people-the drug war and it's time to allow some amnesty for its millions of casualties. |
| Contribute! |
|
You may contact Ron
Ridenour directly
by writing to him at the following e-mail address: Prisonersolidarity.org |